01.08.2022 - 21:13

Prescott, who owned an appliance repair shop, was at a cocktail party when he saw Dresden, one of his competitors. Approaching Dresden, Prescott said, “I’m glad to run into you. I was hoping that we could discuss the possibility of going into partnership

Question:

Prescott, who owned an appliance repair shop, was at a cocktail party when he saw Dresden, one of his competitors. Approaching Dresden, Prescott said, ‘I’m glad to run into you. I was hoping that we could discuss the possibility of going into partnership instead of competing with each other.’ Dresden responded, ‘I wouldn’t go into business with you because you’re the most incompetent person I’ve ever known.’ Audit, a customer of Prescott’s, overheard the conversation. As a result, the following day, Audit canceled a contract that he had with Prescott.

If Prescott asserts a claim against Dresden for defamation, Prescott will be successful if:

A. Dresden knew or should have known that the statement was defamatory when he made it.

B. Dresden knew or should have known that the statement was false when he made it.

C. Dresden knew or should have known that the statement would be overheard when he made it.

D. Dresden knew or should have known that harm would result from the statement.

Answers (1)
  • Constance
    April 10, 2023 в 13:47
    B. Dresden knew or should have known that the statement was false when he made it. Defamation is the act of making a false statement that harms the reputation of an individual or business. In this scenario, Dresden called Prescott the "most incompetent person" he had ever known, which is a negative and harmful statement about Prescott's character and abilities. For Prescott to successfully assert a claim of defamation against Dresden, he would need to prove that Dresden's statement was false and that Dresden knew or should have known that it was false when he made it. Option B reflects this requirement. Option A refers to actual malice, which is a higher level of knowledge required in cases involving public figures. Option C is irrelevant to the issue of defamation. Option D refers to the concept of damages, which is a separate element of a defamation claim.
Do you know the answer?

Leave a comment

Not sure about the answer?
Find the right answer to the question Prescott, who owned an appliance repair shop, was at a cocktail party when he saw Dresden, one of his competitors. Approaching Dresden, Prescott said, “I’m glad to run into you. I was hoping that we could discuss the possibility of going into partnership by subject Contract law, and if there is no answer or no one has given the right answer, then use the search and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for other answers
New questions in the category: Contract law
Authorization
*
*

Password generation